Samples / GLPI-103 / regulatory/m1/meetings/MTG-PreIND_briefing_book.md

Pre-IND Meeting Briefing Document — GLPI-103

Field Value
Document ID MTG-PREIND
Version 1.0
Status Final (portfolio)
Meeting type Type B (Pre-IND) — FDA, Division of Diabetes, Lipid Disorders, and Obesity [MOCK]
Compound GLPI-103 (GLP-1 / Apelin [APJ] receptor dual agonist)
Sponsor Virtual Biopharma Inc.
Standard(s) 21 CFR 312.82 · FDA Formal Meetings Guidance (PDUFA VII) · ICH M3(R2)
Confidentiality Confidential

[MOCK] Briefing document supporting a Pre-IND meeting to align on the nonclinical package, first-in-human design, and CMC adequacy to support the IND.

Change History

Version Date Author Summary
1.0 2026-06-30 Regulatory Affairs Initial Pre-IND briefing document

1. Meeting Objectives

To obtain FDA agreement that (i) the nonclinical pharmacology/toxicology package supports first-in-human dosing, (ii) the proposed Phase 1 SAD/MAD design and starting dose are acceptable, and (iii) the CMC and clinical pharmacology plans are adequate for the IND.

2. Product Background and Rationale

GLPI-103 is a first-in-class synthetic peptide dual agonist of the GLP-1 and apelin (APJ) receptors for T2DM, combining established GLP-1 glycaemic/weight benefit with APJ-mediated insulin-sensitizing, vascular, and myocardial effects (M2.5; PM-007).

3. Summary of Supporting Data

4. Proposed Phase 1 Program

SAD (40 healthy volunteers, 5 cohorts) and MAD (40 T2DM/prediabetes, 4 cohorts), with sentinel dosing, stopping rules, and PK/PD (apelin, NT-proBNP, hsCRP) (PM-007 §6).

5. Questions for the Agency

  1. Does the Agency agree that the nonclinical package is adequate to support the proposed first-in-human single- and multiple-ascending-dose studies?
  2. Does the Agency agree with the proposed starting dose and dose-escalation scheme, including the MABEL/NOAEL rationale and safety factors?
  3. Does the Agency concur that the proposed safety monitoring (sentinel dosing, stopping rules, AESI definitions including thyroid C-cell and pancreatitis surveillance) is appropriate?
  4. Does the Agency agree that the CMC information proposed for the IND (drug substance/product controls and stability) is sufficient to support Phase 1?
  5. Are there specific requirements for the clinical pharmacology package (e.g., dedicated QT, hepatic/renal impairment) that should be planned now?

6. Proposed Agreements

Sponsor seeks written agreement on Questions 1-5 to enable IND submission within ~60 days of the meeting.